• Skip to main content

Lukas Partners Ltd

Web Design & Digital Marketing

  • Home
  • Services
  • Our story
  • News
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Juniors / What do you look at when you consider if a red player is ready for orange ball?

May 23 2016

What do you look at when you consider if a red player is ready for orange ball?

What are the new challenges that a player has when they move from red to orange? What do we need to look out for and what can we, as a coach, do to smooth the young player’s transition?

Court dimensions

Depending on which manual or guidelines you read, a red court for official competition will measure 11 x 5.5m to 12 x 6m. The orange court should be 18 x 6.5m for singles. In square metres, this means an increase of 93%. The percentage increase for the height of the child over the same time could be 0%.

Court width

We know that a key part of coaching is to teach players to receive the oncoming ball, move and prepare, strike and recover. Movement requires coordination and therefore has to be taught and learnt. An increase in court width from the red court to the orange court, assuming we are going from 5.5 or 6m at red, to 6.5m at orange, is a proportionate and realistic increase in the court coverage required across the baseline, and therefore should not present many challenges for young players.

Court length

An increase in court length from 11 or 12m to 18m means that the court is 3 – 3.5m longer at each end. This means that an awful lot suddenly changes in the way that a young child needs to play the game:

  1. the court is longer, so the player needs a longer and faster swing to propel the ball the additional distance to keep the opponent at the back of the court. This will be helped by progressing to a 63 cm (25 inch) racket. Has the player learnt the correct shapes on the red court based on simple shoulder-led swings and stable wrist which do not break down under pressure and which can be replicated consistently? If the answer to this is “no”, then it is unlikely that the player will cope with the increase in swing length (changing from a straight take back or very shallow loop at red to a longer loop at orange). Remember that players have to learn control and rhythm first, before faster racket head speed is added.
  2. greater racket head speed should eventually result in more consistent depth being achieved in rally situations but this will take some time. However, the likelihood is that greater distance will also result in higher trajectories to help achieve the greater distance required. Higher trajectories mean higher bounces, which, coupled with the slight increase in compression of many orange balls, results in higher average contact points. Have your players developed eastern or semi western (not extreme!) grips by the time they leave the red court, so that they can progress on the orange court to deal with higher bounces?
  3. a longer swing with a steeper path and a semi western grip will result in more topspin. The extra length of the orange court facilitates greater spin. By the time they leave the red court, can your players cover the width of the court and play from out wide? On the orange court you can be sure that they will have to play more balls from wide positions and from short angles.
  4. take a look at the distance from the orange baseline to the net. Now consider the stride length of 8 and 9 year old players. It’s a long way to the net, so asking players to approach is a tough expectation. Can your late red players change the tempo of the rally by hitting a little harder or flatter with intent and accuracy and do they have the receiving skills to recognise an opportunity to approach? If not, it is likely that they will struggle to approach with ball speed and accuracy to allow them the chance to approach the net? Do they have the ability to play a basic volley on the red court, so that they can take this to the orange court and learn to volley from close to the service line (they may not get much closer to the net than this due to the distance)?

The ball

  1. a longer court means more time, but orange balls are smaller so they travel faster. They have slightly greater compression, so they fly and bounce a little faster too. Players should, in theory, have better technique, and so overall we can expect increases in ball speeds. Players should be developing better depth perception (depth perception in young tennis players lags behind width perception) and so should be seeing the ball more quickly.
  2. Higher trajectories and slightly higher average bounces mean more variation in contact point heights when the opponent attacks fast and wide. It’s fair to say that on the red court the range of contacts should be narrower, usually between knee and stomach height. At orange, as the players face more offensive opponents, the range of contacts extends, not just to knee to shoulder height but also wider and shorter as more spin and angles are used in attack. Do your players have good receiving skills by the time they leave the red court so that they can continue to progress on the orange court? They need to establish consistent contact points early on, so that the range of heights of contact points can be extended as the game becomes more dynamic (attacking and defending) on the orange court.
  3. Higher trajectories and slightly higher average bounces mean that players will have to play from far from the net and well behind the baseline when the opponent plays high and deep. Has your player learnt to see the ball early and move backwards at red, so that they can defend effectively from deep on the orange court?

Height of the net

A red net should be 80 cms high. Given that the orange game is played on regular courts with lines added, many coaches forget to lower the net to the same 80 cms (or can’t due to an absence of net winders!). This is affects the serve and tactical intentions:

  1. I’ve already explained that whilst the length of the court has increased significantly in a short period of time, the player won’t have grown much at all. The same can be said about the distance to the opponents’ service box and the height of the contact point on the serve. Have your players learnt to serve with a fluid action, using a consistent ball toss? If not, the serve cannot progress to become an offensive stroke where the server tries to create an advantage, and will instead be attacked by better opponents at every opportunity.
  2. a net height of 80 cms allows for angles to be created on wide serves, even when the extra distance of the orange baseline is taken into account. But players can only serve offensively if they are able to apply racket head speed and spin to the serve. By the time your players are leaving the red court, can they serve consistently and fluidly with a chopper grip? If not, they’ll struggle and this needs to become a priority at early orange. The lack of spin, direction and ball speed does not create the angles which are offered by a longer court, extra width and a lower net, and the player will struggle to build or attack with the serve. Worse still, if the net is too high, the player may try to find a false solution by turning back to a forehand grip on the serve to come under the ball so that they can hit the ball over the higher net
  3. good simple and consistent technique on the serve is also essential to control the longer 63 cm (25 inch) racket which is needed on the orange court. If the technique is not well developed with the 58 cm (23 inch) racket on the red court, the 63 cm will be even harder to control.

Solutions

The aim of this article is not to stop you from moving players from red to orange. It’s more about making you think, just taking time to reflect and understand the issues thrown up by the change in the playing environment. Progression and moving players up is good, provided that it is done in the right way and at the right time. It’s a decision to be made by the coach, not the parent or the player! Nor is it simply about progression players as soon as they pass their 8th birthday. Hopefully, you are now a little clearer about the physical, physiological and technical issues that also have to be considered. These are your field, one in which you need to be the expert, so take your time and make the right call. There are some things you can do to phase the orange court in, to ease the transition a little:

  1. gradually introduce the progression to orange by allowing players to double up for a set period as they are preparing to leave the red programme. If they can play on red courts and orange courts every week for a period of time, it provides a more gradual induction
  2. introduce the orange ball at the end of red, playing at the ‘rorange’ level, so to speak! This will allow players to get used to slightly different ball characteristics. Make sure you do it the right way round – moving to the orange court with the red ball won’t work!
  3. turn the players around so they face a different way. Your players will have grown up playing across the court on the red court. At the end of the red programme, try playing from the service line over the 80 cm net. From there you can gradually extend the length of the orange court, as you probably did at red.
  4. parent education is vital. We spend so much time with the players but we ignore the ones who make the decisions, pay for lessons and drive them around. Good communication with parents is essential. If they understand the issues at stake when progressing players, they are more likely to be on your side. Work with them rather than without them.

Written by SharonLeeLukas · Categorized: Juniors, Player transitions

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2022 · Copyright Lukas Partners · Built on the Genesis Framework